Switching to a glyphosate free weed kille ris becoming an essential choice for the modern gardener who cares about both personal health and the planet. While glyphosate-based products have long been used for weed control, growing concerns over potential health risks—such as links to cancer and neurological conditions—are encouraging gardeners to seek safer, natural alternatives. Choosing a glyphosate free weed killer not only protects your family, pets, and local wildlife, but also supports soil health, biodiversity, and water quality. As we become more conscious of our environmental impact, moving away from harmful chemicals and embracing organic, eco-friendly weed control is a powerful step toward greener, healthier gardening.

Causing Cancer

Bayer ordered to pay €1.9 billion by US court in Roundup cancer case

Pharmaceutical company Bayer took over weed killer Roundup in its acquisition of US agrochemical company Monsanto back in 2018. However, it has since been hit with thousands of cancer-related Roundup cases

Read More

Councils working to eradicate glyphosate

UK Councils

Many UK councils are actively working to reduce or eliminate the use of glyphosate, a common herbicide, in their operations.Some have fully banned its use and transitioned to pesticide-free methods, while others have committed to phasing it out or reducing its usage significantly.This includes efforts to find and implement alternative weed management strategies.

Read More

vote NO to glyphosate on EU governments

Government vote NO

In a letter 291 scientists - including 104 professors - from Belgium and the Netherlands ask their ministers to take independent science seriously. This is very important because the official evaluation by EU and national agencies work with a protocol that strongly favours studies commissioned by the chemical industry over independent science.

Read More

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma following exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides

STOP GLYPHOSATE

Scientists examined the scientific and regulatory literature and based their conclusion on “limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans”, “sufficient evidence” in experimental animals and “strong evidence” on mechanism of toxicity such as cell and DNA damage.

Read More